Bibliography

Export 147 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Title is O  [Clear All Filters]
1914
G. Kittel, Die Oden Salomos überarbeitet oder einheitlich?. Leipzig: Pries, 1914.
L. Tondelli, Le Odi di Salomone: cantici cristiani degli inizi del II secolo. Versione dal siriaco, introduzione e note. Rome: F. Ferrari, 1914.
J. Pinkerton, “The Origin and the Early History of the Syriac Pentateuch”, Journal of theological studies, vol. 15, pp. 14-41, 1914.
1913
E. A. Abbott, “The Original Language of the Odes of Solomon”, Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 44–45, 1913.
R. H. Connolly, “The Original Language of the Odes of Solomon”, Journal of Theological studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45-47, 1913.
1912
D. Wiley, “The Odes and Psalms of Solomon”, Journal of Theological studies, vol. 14, pp. 293-298, 1912.
J. Henry Bernard, The Odes of Solomon, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1912.
E. A. Abbott, “The Original Language of the Odes of Solomon”, Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 14, pp. 441–443, 1912.
1911
H. Hansen, Die Oden Salomos in deutschen Nachdichtungen. Gütersloh: G. Bertelsmann, 1911.
S. A. Fries, “Die Oden Salomos: Montanistische Lieder aus dem 2. Jahrhundert”, Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft , vol. 12, pp. 108-125, 1911.
H. Grimme, Die Oden Salomos: syrisch-hebräisch-deutsch: Ein kritischer Versuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winters, 1911.
G. Diettrich, Die Oden Salomos unter Berücksichtigung der überlieferten Stichengliederung. Aus dem Syrischen ins Deutsche übersetzt und mit einem Kommentar versehen. Berlin: Trowitzsch & Sohn, 1911.
J. R. Harris, The Odes and Psalms of Solomon: Published from the Syriac Version, vol. 2, 2 vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911.
J. Labourt and Batiffol, P., “Les Odes de Salomon texte (suite et fin)”, Revue Biblique, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5-59, 1911.
P. Batiffol and Labourt, J., Les Odes de Salomon. Une oeuvre chrétienne des environs de l'an 100-120. Traduction française et introduction historique. Paris: Gabalda, 1911.
W. H. Worrell, “The Odes of Solomon and the Pistis Sophia”, Journal of Theological studies, vol. 13, pp. 29-46, 1911.
1910
H. Gunkel, “Die Oden Salomos”, Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 11, pp. 291-328, 1910.
A. Ungnad and Staerk, W., Die Oden Salomos: aus dem syrischen übersetzt, mit Anmerkungen. Bonn: A. Marcus und E. Weber, 1910.
J. Wellhausen, “The Odes and Psalms of Solomon”, Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen, vol. 172, pp. 629-641, 1910.
P. Batiffol and Labourt, J., “Les Odes de Salomon”, Revue Biblique, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 483-500, 1910.
J. Henry Bernard, “The Odes of Solomon”, The Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 12, pp. 1-31, 1910.
F. C. Conybeare, “The Odes of Solomon Montanist”, Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, vol. 11, pp. 70-75, 1910.
A. S. Lewis, The old Syriac Gospels or Evangelion da-Mepharreshe; being the text of the Sinai or Syro-Antiochene Palimpsest, including the latest additions and emendations. London: Williams and Norgate, 1910.
1909
J. R. Harris, The odes and Psalms of Solomon: Now First Published from the Syriac Version, vol. 1, 2 vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909.
1908
I. Pizzi, “Omelia di San Giacomo di Sarugh in Lode di San Simone Stilita”, Bessarione, vol. 12, pp. 18-29, 1908.
1907
R. H. Connolly, “The Original Language of the Syriac Acts of John”, Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 8, pp. 249-261, 1907.
R. H. Connolly, “The Original Language of the Syriac Acts of John”, The Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 8, pp. 249-261, 1907.
1905
E. Nestle, “Ottley, The Book of Isaiah, according to the Septuagint 1905”, Theologische Literaturzeitung, vol. 30, p. col. 465, 1905.
1903
The Oxyrhynchus papyri / Part 3, [Nos 401-653], vol. 3. London: Egypt Exploration Fund, 1903.
1901
“Oriens Christianus”. 1901.
1900
F. C. Burkitt, “The Original Language of the Acts of Judas Thomas ”, Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 1, pp. 280-290, 1900.
1899
F. Nau, “Opuscules maronites”, Revue de l'Orient chrétien, vol. 4, pp. 318-342, 1899.
1893
F. H. Chase, The Old Syriac element in the Codex Bezae. London: Macmillan and Co., 1893.
1889
J. P. P. Martin, Les origines de l'Eglise d'Edesse et des Eglises syriennes. Paris; Amiens: Maisonneuve et Ch. Leclerc; Rousseau-Leroy, 1889.
1888
L. J. Tixeront, Les Origines de l'Église d'Édesse et la légende d'Abgar. Étude critique suivie de deux textes orientaux inédits. Paris: Maissonneuve, 1888.
1885
A. Roberts and Donaldson, J., “Origen against Celsus”, in Fathers of the Third Century: Tertullian, Fourth Part; Minucius Felix; Commodian; Origen, Parts First and Second, Buffalo: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1885.
1880
G. Hoffmann, Opuscula nestoriana syriace tradidit. Paris: Maisonneuve, 1880.
1875
F. Field, Origenis Hexaplorum quae supersunt; sive, Veterum interpretum Graecorum in totum Vetus Testamentum fragmenta, vol. 1, 2 vol. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1875.
1869
J. M. Schönfelder, Onkelos und Peschittho. Studien über das Alter des Onkelos'schen Targums. Munich: J.J. Lentner, 1869.
1855
W. Cureton, “An Oration of Meliton the Philosopher”, in Spicilegium syriacum, containing remains of Bardesan, Meliton, Ambrose, and Mara bar Serapion, London: Rivingtons, 1855, pp. 41–51.
1853
Officium Feriale juxta Ritum Ecclesiae Syrorum: S.Congreg. de Propaganda Fide jussu editum. Rome: Sacred Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, 1853.
1817
M. Norberg, Onomasticon Codicis Nasaraei, cui liber Adami nomen. London: Berling, 1817.
1816
C. M. Agrell, Otiola Syriaca. Lund: Berlingianis, 1816.
1812
F. D. Münter, Odae Gnosticae Salomoni tributae, thebaice et latine, praefatione et adnotationibus philologicis illustratae. Copenhagen: Johannes Fridericus Schultz, 1812.
1666
Pope Innocent X, Officia sanctorum juxta ritum ecclesiae Maronitarum: Pars aestiva, vol. 2, 2 vol. Rome: Typographia Sacrae Congregationis de Propaganda Fide, 1666.
1656
Pope Innocent X, Ed., Officia sanctorum juxta ritum ecclesiae Maronitarum: Pars hyemalis, vol. 1, 2 vol. Rome: Typographia Sacrae Congregationis de Propaganda Fide, 1656.
0
“ORBIS: The Stanford Geospatial Network Model of the Roman World”. .

Pages